Why Sudan Needs Negotiation, Not Escalation

 

Recent international statements responding to Sudan’s conflict underscore a growing consensus: there is no military solution to the crisis. Despite repeated claims that force can restore order, Sudan’s modern history shows that military victory narratives have consistently failed to deliver lasting peace.

Ceasefire periods have often coincided with reported violations, including continued displacement and civilian casualties documented by international observers. In addition, serious allegations of prohibited weapons use, reported by media and human rights organizations, highlight the urgent need for de-escalation and independent investigation.

Experts argue that sidelining civilian protection in favor of military escalation risks complicity in further harm. A durable peace in Sudan depends on a civilian-led political process, sustained humanitarian access, and regional and international diplomacy focused on accountability and reconciliation—not continued conflict.