Netanyahu Writes in Request for a Nobel Peace Prize for Donald Trump; Reveals in His White House Meeting

 

In a move as politically symbolic as it is controversial, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu disclosed during his recent visit to the White House that he has officially written to the Nobel Prize Committee—endorsing former U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. This revelation adds another layer to the already complex narrative surrounding Trump's post-presidential legacy.

The disclosure comes after Trump’s long-standing grievance about being overlooked for the prestigious prize, despite multiple nominations. During Netanyahu's visit to Washington in February, Trump once again aired this sentiment, stating, “It’s too bad. I deserve it, but they will never give it to me.” That moment, initially dismissed by many as political theater, now appears to have triggered an actual diplomatic gesture.

Netanyahu's letter is seen by some as an act of loyalty and gratitude. Trump's administration played a pivotal role in brokering the Abraham Accords, normalizing diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations including the UAE and Bahrain—an achievement that many argue did promote regional stability. For that, Trump did receive Nobel nominations in 2020, but the prize ultimately went elsewhere.

Yet, the question remains: does brokering selective deals merit a global peace prize, or does it reflect a narrow political alliance? For critics, Netanyahu’s endorsement may be less about peace and more about political posturing—a calculated move to elevate Trump’s international profile ahead of the U.S. 2024 election cycle and to rekindle conservative unity.

Supporters argue otherwise, pointing to Trump’s role in redefining Middle East diplomacy. They claim the Abraham Accords were a turning point, achieved without conventional warfare and done through diplomacy and regional cooperation. In their view, if former U.S. Presidents like Barack Obama could receive the Nobel Peace Prize largely based on aspirations, Trump—who delivered a signed deal—should not be dismissed outright.

But the Nobel Peace Prize is not just about single achievements; it's about enduring impact, moral leadership, and global consensus. The optics of a political ally—Netanyahu—nominating a controversial figure like Trump raises questions about the neutrality and legitimacy of such recommendations. It blurs the line between genuine recognition and transactional politics.

In the end, Netanyahu’s letter may not sway the Nobel Committee, but it undoubtedly reopens the debate: Can controversial leaders still be peacemakers in the eyes of history? Or does the prize risk being politicized beyond repair?

Either way, the gesture has already achieved something Trump values almost as much as the prize itself—attention, validation, and headlines.